Medical System

Traditional vs. Holistic Health ─ Why Our Medical Systems Treat Health Symptoms Rather Than Causes

Prescriptions form the core of conventional medicine, serving as the primary approach to treating health issues. In most cases, healthcare professionals address health concerns through prescribed medications or specific treatment routines, focusing mainly on alleviating symptoms rather than tackling the deeper, underlying causes of a disease.

This symptom-centric approach in traditional medicine has several underlying reasons. Over the centuries, the evolution of conventional medical systems has predominantly been based on empirical observations—healthcare practitioners noted symptoms and cataloged the efficacy of various treatments that seemed to alleviate these symptoms.

This historical reliance has been largely due to the limited scientific knowledge available at the time, which made it difficult to investigate and understand the complex physiological processes underlying many conditions.

As a result, traditional medicine often developed without a detailed understanding of the diseases it aimed to treat, leading to practices that prioritize immediate relief from discomfort rather than long-term health solutions. It has ingrained a kind of symptomatic fixation within the healthcare industry, which continues even as modern medicine advances and gains a greater capacity to explore and resolve the root causes of diseases.

Ancient medical practices were based on trial and error and eye-witness accounts of what seemed to work. It’s also important to note that many medical systems developed before the modern scientific understanding of human anatomy, physiology, and pathology. As a result, they sometimes lack the conceptual framework to effectively identify and address root causes.

Some medical systems, such as Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and Ayurveda, emphasize a holistic approach to health. This approach includes considering the interconnectedness of various bodily systems and environmental factors, often prioritizing restoring balance in the body over targeting specific causes.

Practitioners within traditional medical systems often rely on empirical observations and practical experience to diagnose and treat illnesses. This reliance on observational data rather than on rigorous scientific evidence or laboratory tests can skew healthcare towards symptomatic relief rather than a thorough investigation of the underlying causes of a disease.

This approach is deeply rooted in the historical development of medicine, where early physicians based their treatments on the results they could observe directly and the knowledge passed down through generations.

Moreover, cultural beliefs and traditions play a significant role in shaping the practices and preferences of traditional medicine. In some cultures, there is a profound emphasis on spiritual or metaphysical explanations for illnesses.

Such beliefs may lead to the adoption of health management practices that focus on spiritual healing and traditional remedies, often sidelining more scientifically proven methods.

For instance, some cultural traditions may prioritize herbal remedies, spiritual interventions, or holistic approaches that consider the emotional and spiritual well-being of the patient alongside, or sometimes even over, their physical health.

In other cultures, there might be a stigma associated with stepping outside the traditional medical systems. This stigma can prevent individuals from seeking modern medical treatments that might be more effective in addressing the root causes of an illness.

Source: thehill.com

The resistance to modern medicine can be due to various factors, including mistrust of new technologies, fear of side effects, or a deep-seated belief in the sufficiency and superiority of traditional methods.

This interplay between cultural practices and medical treatment choices significantly influences the overall health outcomes of communities adhering to such traditional systems, often at the cost of ignoring advancements that could offer better therapeutic results.

While traditional medicine may excel in managing symptoms and promoting general well-being, it does not always provide effective solutions for addressing underlying causes of diseases. Still, it’s important to acknowledge that in all forms of medicine, the extent to which conventional medicine focuses on symptoms rather than causes can vary widely depending on the specific tradition, practitioner, and context.

With so much variation and nuance, it can be difficult to understand the discourse surrounding holistic healing and its true differentiators from traditional medicine.

Christina Rahm, MS, PhD, EdD, is an internationally recognized entrepreneur, scientific leader, spokesperson, and innovator in the health and wellness space who spoke to us about her journey toward holistic medicine. Her perspective is especially interesting, considering her scientific background.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Dr. Christina Rahm (@drchristinarahm)

She travels the world presenting, lecturing, and educating the private and public sectors about the bold new world of nutraceuticals, wellness strategies, and environmental solutions, ultimately paving the way for the advancement of humanity.

If there’s ample discourse surrounding the many benefits of holistic medicine, why have so few people and systems fully adopted the approach to date?

Small providers may be able to help guide the holistic health journey thanks to their lack of a corporate model and ability to personalize each interaction.

Financial considerations also often provide a roadblock for traditional systems. There’s no clear way to charge patients for services when the approach is less symptom-based and more concentrated on a long-term health trajectory. Significant training, research, and infrastructure development would be required to effect change in this area.

Increasing patient education and awareness is pivotal in transitioning from symptom-focused to cause-focused healthcare. Traditional medicine often operates under tight schedules, limiting the time for comprehensive discussions about lifestyle, diet, and other underlying factors that contribute to illness.

Source: elysiaretreat.com.au

By contrast, holistic health education focuses on empowering patients with knowledge about how various aspects of their lives interact to influence their health.

Workshops, seminars, and online resources that discuss holistic methods can demystify alternative approaches, helping individuals make informed choices about their health. Educating patients about the importance of preventative care and the long-term benefits of addressing root causes can shift public expectations and demand toward more integrative healthcare solutions.

To truly integrate holistic approaches into mainstream healthcare, significant policy reform is needed. Current healthcare policies often prioritize immediate, measurable outcomes, which aligns poorly with the holistic approach’s emphasis on long-term, preventative care.

Advocating for healthcare reforms that recognize and reimburse preventative and integrative health practices is essential.

Policies that support research into holistic treatments and their long-term efficacy could bridge the gap between traditional and holistic medicine.

This would not only encourage healthcare providers to adopt more comprehensive strategies but also ensure that these practices are accessible and affordable to a broader population, fostering a healthier society that values and understands the benefits of holistic health.